Welfare effects of supplementary insurance: a comment.

نویسنده

  • Patricia M Danzon
چکیده

This issue of the Journal features two papers, Community Rating of Health Insurance and Different Benefit Packages by Matthias Kifman and Alternative Health Insurance Schemes: A Welfare Comparison by Hansen and Keiding, that examine the welfare implications of permitting voluntary supplementary insurance in a regime with a community-rated, compulsory basic insurance package. This is a critical question in any country that either has adopted or is considering some mix of private and compulsory/public insurance, including Germany, the Netherlands and the US. The conclusions of these papers appear to be radically different. Hansen and Keiding (HK) conclude that a compulsory scheme with voluntary supplementation is likely to be welfare superior to the pure compulsory scheme, but that the compulsory scheme alone may also be welfare-dominated by a pure voluntary market insurance regime, using either a Hicksian or an average utility criterion of welfare improvement. By contrast, Matthias Kifman (MK) concludes that if the insurers that offer the compulsory basic benefit are also permitted to offer supplementary coverage, this can only benefit low risks at the expense of high risks. Hence, if one purpose of the compulsory insurance is to enforce a cross-subsidy from low to high risks, permitting supplementation is likely to be counterproductive. However, MK also concludes that high risks may be better off if the insurers that offer the supplementary benefit are subsidized while those that offer only the basic benefit are taxed, which seems counterintuitive, given the initial finding, that permitting supplementation without a subsidy benefits low risks at the expense of high risks. These apparently contradictory findings are possible because the two papers differ in their basic assumptions. Within their respective assumptions each paper makes a significant contribution. HK provide a welfare comparison between several alternative health insurance regimes: (1) an unregulated, voluntary market regime; (2) a compulsory and uniform universal regime with community rating; (3) a compulsory, universal, community-rated regime that permits private supplementary insurance. Their analysis offers two significant advances over previous papers on this topic. First, in order to make the welfare comparison between the community-rated compulsory insurance regime and the voluntary private insurance regime, HK derive the level of the compulsory insurance as the equilibrium choice in a median voter model of political choice. Modeling the compulsory coverage as an endogenous outcome of rational choice within the political process is an important step towards realism. More often, papers on this topic simply assume that the level of compulsory coverage is somehow optimally chosen by a benevolent, omniscient regulator (for example, Dahlby, 1981) or the political determinants of this choice are ignored (for example, Kifman

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Designing a Supplementary Health Insurance Model for Iran

Designing a Supplementary Health Insurance Model for Iran Ali Vafaee Najar 1, Elaheh Hooshmand 1, * 1Social Determinates of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Abstract Background: Considering the importance of complementary health insurance and the necessity of designing a supplementary insurance model for the health system of the country, the purpose...

متن کامل

The Effect of Supplementary Health Insurance on Out-of-Pocket Payments for Elderly Households in Urban Areas of Iran: Heckman Selection Model

Objectives: Considering the growth of the elderly population and the need of the elderly for health services and the importance of supplementary insurance on improving the quality of life of the elderly households, this study aimed to investigate the effect of supplementary health insurance on out-of-pocket payments for elderly households in urban areas of Iran. Methods: this descriptive-analy...

متن کامل

Supplementary Material to “Facilitating Consumer Learning in Insurance Markets—What Are the Welfare Effects?”

In this supplementary material, which is not meant to be published, we provide some proofs that were omitted from our paper “Facilitating Consumer Learning in Insurance Markets— What Are the Welfare Effects?”. We also investigate the robustness of the results in our paper with respect to the assumption that the information acquisition cost enters the agent’s payoff additively. Section 1 proves ...

متن کامل

Health and Mortality Delta: Assessing the Welfare Cost of Household Insurance Choice∗

We develop a pair of risk measures for the universe of health and longevity products that includes life insurance, annuities, and supplementary health insurance. Health delta measures the differential payoff that a policy delivers in poor health, while mortality delta measures the differential payoff that a policy delivers at death. Optimal portfolio choice simplifies to the problem of choosing...

متن کامل

Satisfaction of Supplementary Insurance and Medical Services during Trips in War Survivors and their Families

Introduction: During trips the imposed costs are aggravated due to time and financial limits, not being familiar with treatment centers that are covered by the insurances and charges for accommodation. Insurance, especially supplementary treatment services insurance can be an appropriate solution to decrease these costs. These kinds of insurances cover a range of services inclu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of health economics

دوره 21 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002